> On 12 Aug 2016, at 14:11 PM, 李强 wrote:
>
> Hi Dmitry
>
>>
>>> On 12 Aug 2016, at 04:21 AM, 李强 wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Dmitry,
>>>
>>> I don't see the assert for 'max_frags' in vmxnet device emulation. Could you
>> please point it out?
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I mean that max_frags for vmxnet3 d
> On 12 Aug 2016, at 04:21 AM, 李强 wrote:
>
> Hello Dmitry,
>
> I don't see the assert for 'max_frags' in vmxnet device emulation. Could you
> please point it out?
Hi,
I mean that max_frags for vmxnet3 device is a size of TX ring so assert
introduced by this patch will fire all the time.
> On 11 Aug 2016, at 11:08 AM, Dmitry Fleytman wrote:
>
>
> Acked-by: Dmitry Fleytman
Oops, please ignore this ACK, I replied to the wrong e-mail.
As far as I see max_frags for VMXNET3 is a size of device’s TX ring so this
will always assert.
I don’t think we need this limitation in the de
Acked-by: Dmitry Fleytman
> On 10 Aug 2016, at 23:38 PM, P J P wrote:
>
> From: Li Qiang
>
> When net transport abstraction layer initialises the pkt,
> the maximum fragmentation count is not checked. This could
> lead to an integer overflow causing a NULL pointer dereference.
> Add check to
From: Li Qiang
When net transport abstraction layer initialises the pkt,
the maximum fragmentation count is not checked. This could
lead to an integer overflow causing a NULL pointer dereference.
Add check to avoid it.
Reported-by: Li Qiang
Signed-off-by: Prasad J Pandit
---
hw/net/net_tx_pkt
