On 02/22/2013 09:18 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
>
>> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 05:45:57PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>>> @@ -1397,6 +1398,7 @@ void virtio_net_exit(VirtIODevice *vdev)
>>>
>>> g_free(n->mac_table.macs);
>>> g_free(n->vlans);
>>> +g_free(n->vqs);
Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 05:45:57PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>> @@ -1397,6 +1398,7 @@ void virtio_net_exit(VirtIODevice *vdev)
>>
>> g_free(n->mac_table.macs);
>> g_free(n->vlans);
>> +g_free(n->vqs);
>>
>> for (i = 0; i < n->max_queues; i++) {
>>
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 05:45:57PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> @@ -1397,6 +1398,7 @@ void virtio_net_exit(VirtIODevice *vdev)
>
> g_free(n->mac_table.macs);
> g_free(n->vlans);
> +g_free(n->vqs);
>
> for (i = 0; i < n->max_queues; i++) {
> VirtIONetQueue *q = &n->vqs[
On 02/22/2013 06:32 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> Jason Wang writes:
>
>> Edivaldo reports a problem that the array of NetClientState in NICState is
>> too
>> large - MAX_QUEUE_NUM(1024) which will wastes memory even if multiqueue is
>> not
>> used.
>>
>> Instead of static arrays, solving this is
Jason Wang writes:
> Edivaldo reports a problem that the array of NetClientState in NICState is too
> large - MAX_QUEUE_NUM(1024) which will wastes memory even if multiqueue is not
> used.
>
> Instead of static arrays, solving this issue by allocating the queues on
> demand
> for both the NetCli
Edivaldo reports a problem that the array of NetClientState in NICState is too
large - MAX_QUEUE_NUM(1024) which will wastes memory even if multiqueue is not
used.
Instead of static arrays, solving this issue by allocating the queues on demand
for both the NetClientState array in NICState and Virt
