On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 4:14 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> The behavior you are describing sounds like a bug in QEMU's network
> layer. If RX is disabled we should not queue incoming packets.
>
> Have you looked into fixing QEMU so that the queue is disabled when RX
> is disabled?
it's in e1000_c
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 3:06 PM, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
> 2011/4/25 Stefan Hajnoczi :
>> 2011/4/25 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy :
>>> Dropping packets is sometimes perferred behavior. Add drop_packets
>>> parameter to NICConf struct and let nic simulation decide how to use
>>> it.
>>>
>>> Only e1000
2011/4/25 Stefan Hajnoczi :
> 2011/4/25 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy :
>> Dropping packets is sometimes perferred behavior. Add drop_packets
>> parameter to NICConf struct and let nic simulation decide how to use
>> it.
>>
>> Only e1000 supports this for now.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
>> -
On 04/25/2011 08:40 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
2011/4/25 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy:
Dropping packets is sometimes perferred behavior. Add drop_packets
parameter to NICConf struct and let nic simulation decide how to use
it.
Only e1000 supports this for now.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
---
2011/4/25 Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy :
> Dropping packets is sometimes perferred behavior. Add drop_packets
> parameter to NICConf struct and let nic simulation decide how to use
> it.
>
> Only e1000 supports this for now.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
> ---
> Documentation is missing, but I'
Dropping packets is sometimes perferred behavior. Add drop_packets
parameter to NICConf struct and let nic simulation decide how to use
it.
Only e1000 supports this for now.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy
---
Documentation is missing, but I'm not even sure if there's any other
user who fi
