Thomas Huth writes:
> On 07.05.2018 09:14, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> [...]
>> Two (possibly confused) questions:
>>
>> 1. The user can add nics without convenience options:
>>
>> $ upstream-qemu -display none -nodefaults -device e1000
>> upstream-qemu: warning: nic e1000.0 has no peer
On 07.05.2018 09:14, Markus Armbruster wrote:
[...]
> Two (possibly confused) questions:
>
> 1. The user can add nics without convenience options:
>
> $ upstream-qemu -display none -nodefaults -device e1000
> upstream-qemu: warning: nic e1000.0 has no peer
>
>Shouldn't we silence the
Thomas Huth writes:
> On 03.05.2018 13:47, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Thomas Huth writes:
>>
>>> When running qtests with -nodefaults, we are not interested in
>>> these 'XYZ has no peer' messages.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
>>> ---
>>> net/net.c | 13 +++--
>>> 1 file change
On 03.05.2018 13:47, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Thomas Huth writes:
>
>> When running qtests with -nodefaults, we are not interested in
>> these 'XYZ has no peer' messages.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
>> ---
>> net/net.c | 13 +++--
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-
Thomas Huth writes:
> When running qtests with -nodefaults, we are not interested in
> these 'XYZ has no peer' messages.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
> ---
> net/net.c | 13 +++--
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/net.c b/net/net.c
> index 29f8398.
When running qtests with -nodefaults, we are not interested in
these 'XYZ has no peer' messages.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth
---
net/net.c | 13 +++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/net.c b/net/net.c
index 29f8398..58bf85e 100644
--- a/net/net.c
+++ b/ne
