- "Gerd Hoffmann" wrote:
> On 10/10/10 13:12, Alon Levy wrote:
> >
> > - "Anthony Liguori" wrote:
> >
> >> How is this different than usb_del? Is it that it detaches it but
> >> does
> >> not delete the device?
> >
> > yes. There is no usb_attach command because it was harder to write
On 10/10/10 13:12, Alon Levy wrote:
- "Anthony Liguori" wrote:
How is this different than usb_del? Is it that it detaches it but
does
not delete the device?
yes. There is no usb_attach command because it was harder to write (can't
use the bus.addr since a detached device doesn't have t
- "Anthony Liguori" wrote:
> How is this different than usb_del? Is it that it detaches it but
> does
> not delete the device?
>
yes. There is no usb_attach command because it was harder to write (can't
use the bus.addr since a detached device doesn't have them) and I didn't
need it righ
How is this different than usb_del? Is it that it detaches it but does
not delete the device?
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
On 10/05/2010 09:40 AM, Alon Levy wrote:
Signed-off-by: Alon Levy
---
qemu-monitor.hx | 17 +
sysemu.h|1 +
vl.c| 41 +++
On Tue, 5 Oct 2010 16:40:29 +0200
Alon Levy wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alon Levy
This needs to be rebased as it now conflicts with my last series merged
on master.
I have some minor comments (below), but in general seems ok to me. However,
I'd like to get an ACK from someone familiar with QEMU's
Signed-off-by: Alon Levy
---
qemu-monitor.hx | 17 +
sysemu.h|1 +
vl.c| 41 +
3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/qemu-monitor.hx b/qemu-monitor.hx
index 49bcd8d..9c792a9 100644
--- a
