On 16/11/18 18:12, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> * Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote:
>> There is really no difference between live migration and savevm, except
>> that savevm does not require bdrv_invalidate_cache to be implemented
>> by all disks. However, it is unlikely that savevm is
On Saturday, November 17, 2018 12:48 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] migration: savevm: consult migration
> blockers
>
> There is really no difference between live migration and savevm, except that
> savev
* Paolo Bonzini (pbonz...@redhat.com) wrote:
> There is really no difference between live migration and savevm, except
> that savevm does not require bdrv_invalidate_cache to be implemented
> by all disks. However, it is unlikely that savevm is used with anything
> except qcow2 disks, so the penal
There is really no difference between live migration and savevm, except
that savevm does not require bdrv_invalidate_cache to be implemented
by all disks. However, it is unlikely that savevm is used with anything
except qcow2 disks, so the penalty is small and worth the improvement
in catching bad
