On 07/24/2018 10:59 AM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
* Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote:
I would guess it won't happen normally, but this should ease Coverity.
+++ b/migration/ram.c
@@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ static void multifd_send_pages(void)
p->pages->block = NULL;
multifd_send_s
* Peter Xu (pet...@redhat.com) wrote:
> I would guess it won't happen normally, but this should ease Coverity.
>
> >>> CID 1394385: Integer handling issues (OVERFLOW_BEFORE_WIDEN)
> >>> Potentially overflowing expression "pages->used * 8192U" with type
> >>> "unsigned int" (32 bits, uns
Peter Xu wrote:
> I would guess it won't happen normally, but this should ease Coverity.
>
CID 1394385: Integer handling issues (OVERFLOW_BEFORE_WIDEN)
Potentially overflowing expression "pages->used * 8192U" with
type "unsigned int" (32 bits, unsigned) is evaluated using
I would guess it won't happen normally, but this should ease Coverity.
>>> CID 1394385: Integer handling issues (OVERFLOW_BEFORE_WIDEN)
>>> Potentially overflowing expression "pages->used * 8192U" with type
>>> "unsigned int" (32 bits, unsigned) is evaluated using 32-bit arithmetic,
>>
