On 23.09.2014 11:51, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 23/09/2014 11:46, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
Il 02/09/2014 11:17, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
Juan is back, I'll let him pick it through his tree.
Juan, have you picked this up?
commit db80facefa62dff42bb50c73b0f03eda5f732b49
Author: Peter Lieven
Date
Il 23/09/2014 11:46, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto:
> Il 02/09/2014 11:17, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>>> Juan is back, I'll let him pick it through his tree.
>>
>> Juan, have you picked this up?
>
> commit db80facefa62dff42bb50c73b0f03eda5f732b49
> Author: Peter Lieven
> Date: Tue Jun 10 11:29:1
Il 02/09/2014 11:17, Peter Lieven ha scritto:
>>>
>> Juan is back, I'll let him pick it through his tree.
>
> Juan, have you picked this up?
commit db80facefa62dff42bb50c73b0f03eda5f732b49
Author: Peter Lieven
Date: Tue Jun 10 11:29:16 2014 +0200
migration: catch unknown flags in ram_load
On 22.08.2014 05:57, Amit Shah wrote:
On (Thu) 21 Aug 2014 [23:57:46], Peter Lieven wrote:
Am 11.07.2014 um 14:52 schrieb Amit Shah :
On (Wed) 09 Jul 2014 [12:00:13], Peter Maydell wrote:
On 9 July 2014 11:56, Amit Shah wrote:
On (Wed) 09 Jul 2014 [11:50:18], Peter Maydell wrote:
OK; we're
On (Thu) 21 Aug 2014 [23:57:46], Peter Lieven wrote:
>
> Am 11.07.2014 um 14:52 schrieb Amit Shah :
>
> > On (Wed) 09 Jul 2014 [12:00:13], Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 9 July 2014 11:56, Amit Shah wrote:
> >>> On (Wed) 09 Jul 2014 [11:50:18], Peter Maydell wrote:
> OK; we're treating those
Am 11.07.2014 um 14:52 schrieb Amit Shah :
> On (Wed) 09 Jul 2014 [12:00:13], Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 9 July 2014 11:56, Amit Shah wrote:
>>> On (Wed) 09 Jul 2014 [11:50:18], Peter Maydell wrote:
OK; we're treating those as bugs so yes, I think this is 2.1
material. Has somebody oth
On (Wed) 09 Jul 2014 [12:00:13], Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 9 July 2014 11:56, Amit Shah wrote:
> > On (Wed) 09 Jul 2014 [11:50:18], Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> OK; we're treating those as bugs so yes, I think this is 2.1
> >> material. Has somebody other than the original author tested
> >> it? (Tha
On 07/09/2014 07:23 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> Am 09.07.2014 13:00, schrieb Peter Maydell:
>> On 9 July 2014 11:56, Amit Shah wrote:
>>> On (Wed) 09 Jul 2014 [11:50:18], Peter Maydell wrote:
OK; we're treating those as bugs so yes, I think this is 2.1
material. Has somebody other than the
Am 09.07.2014 13:00, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> On 9 July 2014 11:56, Amit Shah wrote:
>> On (Wed) 09 Jul 2014 [11:50:18], Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> OK; we're treating those as bugs so yes, I think this is 2.1
>>> material. Has somebody other than the original author tested
>>> it? (That's a step tha
(CC'ing Peter Maydell for his thoughts)
On (Tue) 08 Jul 2014 [22:55:42], Peter Lieven wrote:
> Hi Juan,
>
> Am 25.06.2014 um 13:55 schrieb Juan Quintela :
>
> > Peter Lieven wrote:
> >> this patch extends commit db80fac by not only checking
> >> for unknown flags, but also filtering out unknown
Hi Juan,
Am 25.06.2014 um 13:55 schrieb Juan Quintela :
> Peter Lieven wrote:
>> this patch extends commit db80fac by not only checking
>> for unknown flags, but also filtering out unknown flag
>> combinations.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Eric Blake
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven
>
> Reviewed-by: Ju
On 9 July 2014 05:25, Amit Shah wrote:
> (CC'ing Peter Maydell for his thoughts)
>
> On (Tue) 08 Jul 2014 [22:55:42], Peter Lieven wrote:
>> Hi Juan,
>>
>> Am 25.06.2014 um 13:55 schrieb Juan Quintela :
>>
>> > Peter Lieven wrote:
>> >> this patch extends commit db80fac by not only checking
>> >>
On 9 July 2014 11:56, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Wed) 09 Jul 2014 [11:50:18], Peter Maydell wrote:
>> OK; we're treating those as bugs so yes, I think this is 2.1
>> material. Has somebody other than the original author tested
>> it? (That's a step that would usually be done by Juan as the
>> maintain
On (Wed) 09 Jul 2014 [11:50:18], Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 9 July 2014 11:44, Amit Shah wrote:
> > On (Wed) 09 Jul 2014 [11:28:27], Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 9 July 2014 05:25, Amit Shah wrote:
> >> > Juan is away for a couple of weeks. This looks like a good fix to
> >> > pull in for 2.1, th
On 9 July 2014 11:44, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Wed) 09 Jul 2014 [11:28:27], Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 9 July 2014 05:25, Amit Shah wrote:
>> > Juan is away for a couple of weeks. This looks like a good fix to
>> > pull in for 2.1, though. Peter, do you agree? Can you pick this up
>> > if so?
>>
On (Wed) 09 Jul 2014 [11:28:27], Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 9 July 2014 05:25, Amit Shah wrote:
> > (CC'ing Peter Maydell for his thoughts)
> >
> > On (Tue) 08 Jul 2014 [22:55:42], Peter Lieven wrote:
> >> Hi Juan,
> >>
> >> Am 25.06.2014 um 13:55 schrieb Juan Quintela :
> >>
> >> > Peter Lieven w
Peter Lieven wrote:
> this patch extends commit db80fac by not only checking
> for unknown flags, but also filtering out unknown flag
> combinations.
>
> Suggested-by: Eric Blake
> Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven
Reviewed-by: Juan Quintela
Will be on next pull request, thanks.
On 06/24/2014 03:32 AM, Peter Lieven wrote:
> this patch extends commit db80fac by not only checking
> for unknown flags, but also filtering out unknown flag
> combinations.
>
> Suggested-by: Eric Blake
> Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven
> ---
> arch_init.c | 62
> ++--
this patch extends commit db80fac by not only checking
for unknown flags, but also filtering out unknown flag
combinations.
Suggested-by: Eric Blake
Signed-off-by: Peter Lieven
---
arch_init.c | 62 ++-
1 file changed, 32 insertions(+),
19 matches
Mail list logo
