On (Sat) 07 Jun 2014 [02:48:14], Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 06/06/2014 10:50 PM, Amit Shah wrote:
> > On (Thu) 27 Mar 2014 [14:57:26], Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >> The existing timeout is 30ms which on 100MB/s (1Gbit) gives us
> >> 3MB/s rate maximum. If we put some load on the guest, it
On 06/06/2014 10:50 PM, Amit Shah wrote:
> On (Thu) 27 Mar 2014 [14:57:26], Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> The existing timeout is 30ms which on 100MB/s (1Gbit) gives us
>> 3MB/s rate maximum. If we put some load on the guest, it is easy to
>> get page dirtying rate too big so live migration will n
On (Thu) 27 Mar 2014 [14:57:26], Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> The existing timeout is 30ms which on 100MB/s (1Gbit) gives us
> 3MB/s rate maximum. If we put some load on the guest, it is easy to
> get page dirtying rate too big so live migration will never complete.
> In the case of libvirt that m
Il 04/06/2014 12:25, Juan Quintela ha scritto:
>
> Who else needs to be ok to get this in upstream? :) Thanks!
Peter?
David?
Paolo? (I think to remember that they are ok with it)
Certainly okay by me.
Paolo
Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 05/05/2014 09:20 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> On 04/13/2014 12:38 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 03/27/2014 08:01 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Adding Juan.
Ping?
>>
>> Patch is OK for me.
>
>
>
> Who el
On 05/05/2014 09:20 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 04/13/2014 12:38 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> On 03/27/2014 08:01 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Adding Juan.
>>>
>>>
>>> Ping?
>
> Patch is OK for me.
Who else needs to be ok to get this in upstream? :)
Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 04/13/2014 12:38 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 03/27/2014 08:01 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Adding Juan.
>>
>>
>> Ping?
Patch is OK for me.
As sender says, with guests doing anything/bigger than 1GB RAM is
basically implosible to get into the 30ms
On 04/30/2014 11:10 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 04/13/2014 12:38 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 03/27/2014 08:01 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>> Adding Juan.
>>
>>
>> Ping?
>
>
> Ping?
>
>
Ping?
>>
>>>
>>> Alexey Kardashevskiy writes:
>>>
The existing timeout is 30ms w
On 04/13/2014 12:38 AM, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 03/27/2014 08:01 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> Adding Juan.
>
>
> Ping?
Ping?
>
>>
>> Alexey Kardashevskiy writes:
>>
>>> The existing timeout is 30ms which on 100MB/s (1Gbit) gives us
>>> 3MB/s rate maximum. If we put some load on
On 03/27/2014 08:01 PM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Adding Juan.
Ping?
>
> Alexey Kardashevskiy writes:
>
>> The existing timeout is 30ms which on 100MB/s (1Gbit) gives us
>> 3MB/s rate maximum. If we put some load on the guest, it is easy to
>> get page dirtying rate too big so live migratio
Adding Juan.
Alexey Kardashevskiy writes:
> The existing timeout is 30ms which on 100MB/s (1Gbit) gives us
> 3MB/s rate maximum. If we put some load on the guest, it is easy to
> get page dirtying rate too big so live migration will never complete.
> In the case of libvirt that means that the gu
The existing timeout is 30ms which on 100MB/s (1Gbit) gives us
3MB/s rate maximum. If we put some load on the guest, it is easy to
get page dirtying rate too big so live migration will never complete.
In the case of libvirt that means that the guest will be stopped
anyway after a timeout specified
12 matches
Mail list logo
