On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 05:29:47PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Of the block devices that poked into -drive options via drive_get_next,
> m25p80 was the only one who also did not attach itself to the BlockBackend.
>
> Since sd does it, and all other devices go through a "drive" property,
> with t
On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Of the block devices that poked into -drive options via drive_get_next,
> m25p80 was the only one who also did not attach itself to the BlockBackend.
>
> Since sd does it, and all other devices go through a "drive" property,
> with this chang
Of the block devices that poked into -drive options via drive_get_next,
m25p80 was the only one who also did not attach itself to the BlockBackend.
Since sd does it, and all other devices go through a "drive" property,
with this change all block backends attached to the guest will have a
non-NULL
