Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: set minimum uname for RISC-V

2018-04-24 Thread Richard Henderson
On 04/24/2018 06:03 AM, Alex Bennée wrote: > As support was merged into the mainline kernel at 4.15 it is unlikely > 3.8.0 is the correct value. Indeed when I testing binaries created by > the current Debian SID compiler the tests failed with: > > FATAL: kernel too old > > Signed-off-by: Alex B

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: set minimum uname for RISC-V

2018-04-24 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 12:07:43 PDT (-0700), peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote: On 24 April 2018 at 17:40, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 09:03:29 PDT (-0700), alex.ben...@linaro.org wrote: As support was merged into the mainline kernel at 4.15 it is unlikely 3.8.0 is the correct value.

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: set minimum uname for RISC-V

2018-04-24 Thread Peter Maydell
On 24 April 2018 at 17:40, Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 09:03:29 PDT (-0700), alex.ben...@linaro.org wrote: >> >> As support was merged into the mainline kernel at 4.15 it is unlikely >> 3.8.0 is the correct value. Indeed when I testing binaries created by >> the current Debian SID

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: set minimum uname for RISC-V

2018-04-24 Thread Palmer Dabbelt
On Tue, 24 Apr 2018 09:03:29 PDT (-0700), alex.ben...@linaro.org wrote: As support was merged into the mainline kernel at 4.15 it is unlikely 3.8.0 is the correct value. Indeed when I testing binaries created by the current Debian SID compiler the tests failed with: FATAL: kernel too old Sign

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: set minimum uname for RISC-V

2018-04-24 Thread Alex Bennée
As support was merged into the mainline kernel at 4.15 it is unlikely 3.8.0 is the correct value. Indeed when I testing binaries created by the current Debian SID compiler the tests failed with: FATAL: kernel too old Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée --- linux-user/riscv/target_syscall.h | 2 +- 1 f