On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:00:41 +0100
Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 23 April 2014 15:59, Natanael Copa wrote:
> > Avoid using glibc specific internals.
> >
> > Calculate the sigevent pad size is calculated in similar way as kernel
> > does it.
> >
> > This is needed for building with musl libc.
>
> Th
Use the public sigset_t instead of the glibc specific internal
__sigset_t in _syscall.
Calculate the sigevent pad size is calculated in similar way as kernel
does it instead of using glibc internal field _pad.
This is needed for building with musl libc.
Signed-off-by: Natanael Copa
---
Changes
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014 19:00:41 +0100
Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 23 April 2014 15:59, Natanael Copa wrote:
> > Avoid using glibc specific internals.
> >
> > Calculate the sigevent pad size is calculated in similar way as kernel
> > does it.
> >
> > This is needed for building with musl libc.
>
> Th
On 23 April 2014 15:59, Natanael Copa wrote:
> Avoid using glibc specific internals.
>
> Calculate the sigevent pad size is calculated in similar way as kernel
> does it.
>
> This is needed for building with musl libc.
Thanks for this patch -- is this the only fix that was needed, or
are there mo
Avoid using glibc specific internals.
Calculate the sigevent pad size is calculated in similar way as kernel
does it.
This is needed for building with musl libc.
Signed-off-by: Natanael Copa
---
linux-user/syscall.c | 2 +-
linux-user/syscall_defs.h | 6 +-
2 files changed, 6 insertio