Thanks, applied.
Maybe we need more maintainers for linux-user.
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Ping^2, now we're out of freeze? Patchwork URL:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/191133/
>
> -- PMM
>
>
> On 24 October 2012 13:27, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Ping?
>>
>> -- PM
Ping^2, now we're out of freeze? Patchwork URL:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/191133/
-- PMM
On 24 October 2012 13:27, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Ping?
>
> -- PMM
>
> On 12 October 2012 14:55, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> The Linux syscalls underlying pread() and pwrite() take a 64 bit
>> offset on
Ping?
-- PMM
On 12 October 2012 14:55, Peter Maydell wrote:
> The Linux syscalls underlying pread() and pwrite() take a 64 bit
> offset on all architectures, even if some of them name the syscall
> "pread/pwrite" rather than "pread64/pwrite64" for historical reasons.
> So move the four QEMU targ
The Linux syscalls underlying pread() and pwrite() take a 64 bit
offset on all architectures, even if some of them name the syscall
"pread/pwrite" rather than "pread64/pwrite64" for historical reasons.
So move the four QEMU target architectures (arm, i386, sparc,
unicore32) which were defining TARG
