On 5 August 2011 01:05, An-Cheng Huang wrote:
> Ok the following patch changes the number of arguments for sys_syscall
> to 8 in mips_syscall_args and also skips the do_syscall() call if any
> of the get_user() calls fails. Do you think combining these makes sense
> or should they be two separate
On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 11:43:31PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 4 August 2011 23:16, An-Cheng Huang wrote:
> > A simpler approach would be to just change the number of arguments for
> > sys_syscall to 8 in the mips_syscall_args table so that for indirect
> > syscalls the "higher" arguments are
On 4 August 2011 23:16, An-Cheng Huang wrote:
> I ran into the problem of indirect syscalls not working with
> mips-linux-user and found that the number of arguments for sys_syscall
> is 0 in the mips_syscall_args table, which means the "higher" arguments
> (5, 6, 7, and 8) are never obtained from
I ran into the problem of indirect syscalls not working with mips-linux-user
and found that the number of arguments for sys_syscall is 0 in the
mips_syscall_args table, which means the "higher" arguments (5, 6, 7, and 8)
are never obtained from the stack for the do_syscall() invocation for indir
