On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 12:37:10PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Hi,
Hi Riku,
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 03:08:06PM +0200, edgar.igles...@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: "Edgar E. Iglesias"
> >
> > If the host lacks support for SOCK_CLOEXEC or SOCK_NONBLOCK,
> > try to emulate them with fcntl() FD_C
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 03:08:06PM +0200, edgar.igles...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: "Edgar E. Iglesias"
>
> If the host lacks support for SOCK_CLOEXEC or SOCK_NONBLOCK,
> try to emulate them with fcntl() FD_CLOEXEC and O_NONBLOCK.
Last time emulating CLOEXEC with fcntl was discussed, the idea
From: "Edgar E. Iglesias"
If the host lacks support for SOCK_CLOEXEC or SOCK_NONBLOCK,
try to emulate them with fcntl() FD_CLOEXEC and O_NONBLOCK.
Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias
---
linux-user/syscall.c | 48 +---
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
