On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 11:35 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 17:07 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> I think that the dependency on QEMU >= 1.6 is OK. The Xen PV Device went
> in v1.6.0 and we certainy cannot go back to versions
On Tue, 10 Jun 2014, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 17:07 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Choose pc-i440fx-1.6 instead of pc for HVM guests, so that we know for
> > sure what is the machine that we are emulating.
>
> Does 1.6 here refer to the qemu version?
Yes, every new QEMU v
On Fri, 2014-05-23 at 17:07 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Choose pc-i440fx-1.6 instead of pc for HVM guests, so that we know for
> sure what is the machine that we are emulating.
Does 1.6 here refer to the qemu version? If so then I think we need to
consciously decide that we are happy for Xe
Il 03/06/2014 15:38, Stefano Stabellini ha scritto:
On Wed, 28 May 2014, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 28/05/2014 18:41, Stefano Stabellini ha scritto:
However it would still place xen-platform at slot 3 instead of slot 2 if
soundhw is specified. It seems to me that there is not a perfect
solution to
On Tue, 2014-06-03 at 14:38 +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Given that the VM config file exports a soundhw paramter,
... as a string.
That sounds like a libxl API mistake to me. libxl should take an enum
for this sort of thing. Then xl should parse whatever strings it likes
(including specif
Il 03/06/2014 15:38, Stefano Stabellini ha scritto:
Thanks, this sounds like the best option by far.
I noticed that "-soundhw hda" becomes "-device intel-hda".
Given that the VM config file exports a soundhw paramter, we would need
a programmatic way to get the -device command line option from
On Wed, 28 May 2014, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 28/05/2014 18:41, Stefano Stabellini ha scritto:
> > However it would still place xen-platform at slot 3 instead of slot 2 if
> > soundhw is specified. It seems to me that there is not a perfect
> > solution to this problem. We can either:
> >
> > -
2014-05-28 18:50 GMT+02:00 Paolo Bonzini :
> Il 28/05/2014 18:41, Stefano Stabellini ha scritto:
>
> However it would still place xen-platform at slot 3 instead of slot 2 if
>> soundhw is specified. It seems to me that there is not a perfect
>> solution to this problem. We can either:
>>
>> - Sw
Il 28/05/2014 18:41, Stefano Stabellini ha scritto:
However it would still place xen-platform at slot 3 instead of slot 2 if
soundhw is specified. It seems to me that there is not a perfect
solution to this problem. We can either:
- Switch to -machine pc-i440fx-1.6 by default and use consistent
Choose pc-i440fx-1.6 instead of pc for HVM guests, so that we know for
sure what is the machine that we are emulating.
Use pc-i440fx-1.6 regardless of the xen_platform_pci option. Add the
xen-platform device if requested. Choose slot 2 for the xen-platform
device for compatibility with current ins
10 matches
Mail list logo
