On 01/15/2012 10:16 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-01-15 17:12, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 01/15/2012 08:40 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-01-15 15:38, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 01/14/2012 07:12 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka
Linking the RTC device state to the PIIX does not belong into
On 2012-01-15 17:12, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/15/2012 08:40 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-01-15 15:38, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>>> On 01/14/2012 07:12 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka
Linking the RTC device state to the PIIX does not belong into the
common path tha
On 01/15/2012 08:40 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-01-15 15:38, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 01/14/2012 07:12 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka
Linking the RTC device state to the PIIX does not belong into the
common path that is shared with the isapc. QEMU crashes otherwise.
Signed-off-by:
On 2012-01-15 15:38, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 01/14/2012 07:12 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> From: Jan Kiszka
>>
>> Linking the RTC device state to the PIIX does not belong into the
>> common path that is shared with the isapc. QEMU crashes otherwise.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
>
> Does isapc a
On 01/14/2012 07:12 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
From: Jan Kiszka
Linking the RTC device state to the PIIX does not belong into the
common path that is shared with the isapc. QEMU crashes otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
Does isapc actually work for you? I tried to write a qemu-test test case
Am 14.01.2012 14:12, schrieb Jan Kiszka:
> From: Jan Kiszka
>
> Linking the RTC device state to the PIIX does not belong into the
> common path that is shared with the isapc. QEMU crashes otherwise.
Doesn't that indicate a missing NULL-check or something in
qdev_property_add_child() that should
From: Jan Kiszka
Linking the RTC device state to the PIIX does not belong into the
common path that is shared with the isapc. QEMU crashes otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka
---
hw/pc_piix.c | 22 +++---
1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/pc
Thanks, applied.
On Tue, Aug 24, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> Ping.
>
> On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 05:43:20PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/611646
>> reports that ./i386-softmmu/qemu -M isapc segfaults.
>> This patch fixes the segfault introduced by
>> f
Ping.
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 05:43:20PM +0900, Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/611646
> reports that ./i386-softmmu/qemu -M isapc segfaults.
> This patch fixes the segfault introduced by
> f885f1eaa8711c06033ceb1599e3750fb37c306f
>
> It's because i440fx_state in pc_init1(
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/611646
reports that ./i386-softmmu/qemu -M isapc segfaults.
This patch fixes the segfault introduced by
f885f1eaa8711c06033ceb1599e3750fb37c306f
It's because i440fx_state in pc_init1() isn't initialized.
> Core was generated by `./i386-softmmu/qemu -M isapc'.
> Pro
10 matches
Mail list logo