Am 03.12.2014 um 13:35 hat Kevin Wolf geschrieben:
> Our IDE emulation can't handle logical block sizes other than 512. Check
> for it.
>
> The original assumption was that other values would silently be ignored
> (which is bad enough), but it's not quite true: The physical block size
> is exposed
Am 03.12.2014 um 15:37 hat Markus Armbruster geschrieben:
> Kevin Wolf writes:
>
> > Our IDE emulation can't handle logical block sizes other than 512. Check
> > for it.
>
> I guess this is in part due to the 512 literals sprinkled all over the
> IDE code.
Yes, this is one part. The other part
On 12/03/2014 07:35 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Our IDE emulation can't handle logical block sizes other than 512. Check
for it.
The original assumption was that other values would silently be ignored
(which is bad enough), but it's not quite true: The physical block size
is exposed in IDENTIFY DEVI
Kevin Wolf writes:
> Our IDE emulation can't handle logical block sizes other than 512. Check
> for it.
I guess this is in part due to the 512 literals sprinkled all over the
IDE code.
> The original assumption was that other values would silently be ignored
> (which is bad enough), but it's no
Our IDE emulation can't handle logical block sizes other than 512. Check
for it.
The original assumption was that other values would silently be ignored
(which is bad enough), but it's not quite true: The physical block size
is exposed in IDENTIFY DEVICE as a multiple of the logical block size.
Se
