Il 24/04/2013 20:49, Andreas Färber ha scritto:
> Am 24.04.2013 13:30, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
>> Il 24/04/2013 12:37, Hu Tao ha scritto:
>>> Signed-off-by: Hu Tao
>>
>> I had exactly the same patch in my 1.6 queue. :)
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini
>
> The commit message fails to explain *why*
Am 24.04.2013 13:30, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Il 24/04/2013 12:37, Hu Tao ha scritto:
>> Signed-off-by: Hu Tao
>
> I had exactly the same patch in my 1.6 queue. :)
>
> Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini
The commit message fails to explain *why* we can drop updating whatever
RTC memory value there thou
Applied. Thanks.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
Il 24/04/2013 12:37, Hu Tao ha scritto:
> Signed-off-by: Hu Tao
I had exactly the same patch in my 1.6 queue. :)
Reviewed-by: Paolo Bonzini
> ---
> hw/acpi/ich9.c | 2 +-
> hw/i386/pc_q35.c | 15 +--
> hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c | 4 ++--
> include/hw/acpi/ich9.h | 2
Signed-off-by: Hu Tao
---
hw/acpi/ich9.c | 2 +-
hw/i386/pc_q35.c | 15 +--
hw/isa/lpc_ich9.c | 4 ++--
include/hw/acpi/ich9.h | 2 +-
include/hw/i386/ich9.h | 2 +-
5 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/acpi/ich9.c b/hw/acpi/ich9.c