On 11/09/2011 08:21 PM, Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 20:00 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 11/09/2011 07:56 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > > On 11/09/2011 07:44 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > >> The fact that a host cpu supports a feature doesn't mean that QEMU
> > >> and KVM
> > >> will a
On 11/09/2011 07:44 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
The fact that a host cpu supports a feature doesn't mean that QEMU and KVM
will also support it, yet -cpuid host brings host features wholesale.
We need to whitelist each feature separately to make sure we support it.
This patch adds KVM whitelisting (by
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 20:00 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/09/2011 07:56 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> > On 11/09/2011 07:44 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >> The fact that a host cpu supports a feature doesn't mean that QEMU
> >> and KVM
> >> will also support it, yet -cpuid host brings host features wh
On 11/09/2011 07:56 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 11/09/2011 07:44 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> The fact that a host cpu supports a feature doesn't mean that QEMU
>> and KVM
>> will also support it, yet -cpuid host brings host features wholesale.
>>
>> We need to whitelist each feature separately to
On 11/09/2011 07:44 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
The fact that a host cpu supports a feature doesn't mean that QEMU and KVM
will also support it, yet -cpuid host brings host features wholesale.
We need to whitelist each feature separately to make sure we support it.
This patch adds KVM whitelisting (by
The fact that a host cpu supports a feature doesn't mean that QEMU and KVM
will also support it, yet -cpuid host brings host features wholesale.
We need to whitelist each feature separately to make sure we support it.
This patch adds KVM whitelisting (by simply using KVM_GET_SUPPORTED_CPUID
instea
