On 16/10/2015 11:32, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 16 October 2015 at 09:52, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> I'm going to remove the zero address checking and try to start a qemu
>> for each of them to see which ones are broken.
>
> You need to also make sure there's a PCI card in there
> and that the gue
On 16 October 2015 at 09:52, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> I'm going to remove the zero address checking and try to start a qemu
> for each of them to see which ones are broken.
You need to also make sure there's a PCI card in there
and that the guest maps it with a BAR at address zero
(testing both MM
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 10:52:00AM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
>
> On 13/10/2015 15:55, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 13 October 2015 at 14:25, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 13 October 2015 at 14:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 02:12:34PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 13/10/2015 15:55, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 13 October 2015 at 14:25, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 13 October 2015 at 14:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 02:12:34PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
Well, if we're going to go around and fix the machines which
don't
On 13 October 2015 at 14:25, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 13 October 2015 at 14:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 02:12:34PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> Well, if we're going to go around and fix the machines which
>>> don't get things right, I guess. It's a shame the defau
On 13 October 2015 at 14:19, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 02:12:34PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> Well, if we're going to go around and fix the machines which
>> don't get things right, I guess. It's a shame the default for
>> the global is "this machine is broken", becaus
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 02:12:34PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 13 October 2015 at 14:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 02:47:33PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> >> MST asked for a global flag:
> >>
> >> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-ppc/2015-07/msg00364.html
On 13 October 2015 at 14:04, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 02:47:33PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>> MST asked for a global flag:
>>
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-ppc/2015-07/msg00364.html
>>
>> But perhaps the machine is not the good place for this global flag
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 02:47:33PM +0200, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
>
> On 13/10/2015 14:33, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 13 October 2015 at 13:48, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> >> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:16:34AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >>> In any case, setting pci_allow_0_address is the righ
On 13/10/2015 14:33, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 13 October 2015 at 13:48, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:16:34AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> In any case, setting pci_allow_0_address is the right thing,
>>> so we can just change the commit message in this patch.
>>
>> I
On 13 October 2015 at 13:48, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:16:34AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> In any case, setting pci_allow_0_address is the right thing,
>> so we can just change the commit message in this patch.
>
> I will post v2 with an updated changelog then.
>
>>
On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 09:16:34AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 13 October 2015 at 07:31, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:03:03PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 12 October 2015 at 21:55, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> >> > Currently PCI IO address 0 is not allowed eve
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:03:03PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 12 October 2015 at 21:55, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> > Currently PCI IO address 0 is not allowed even though
> > the IO space starts from 0. As result, PCI IO is not
> > possible to use at all.
>
> I don't see any reason for us n
Currently PCI IO address 0 is not allowed even though
the IO space starts from 0. As result, PCI IO is not
possible to use at all.
CC: Peter Maydell
CC: Andrew Jones
Signed-off-by: Alexander Gordeev
---
hw/arm/virt.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/hw/arm/virt.c b/hw/arm/vi
On 13 October 2015 at 07:31, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 10:03:03PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 12 October 2015 at 21:55, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
>> > Currently PCI IO address 0 is not allowed even though
>> > the IO space starts from 0. As result, PCI IO is not
>> >
On 12 October 2015 at 21:55, Alexander Gordeev wrote:
> Currently PCI IO address 0 is not allowed even though
> the IO space starts from 0. As result, PCI IO is not
> possible to use at all.
I don't see any reason for us not to allow 0 IO addresses,
but I'm not sure how your your conclusion follo
16 matches
Mail list logo
