On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 11:02:20AM +0100, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
>* Wei Yang (richardw.y...@linux.intel.com) wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 07:24:34AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>> >Subject doesn't quite conform to conventions. Suggest
>> >
>> >hmp: Improve how "info migrate" fo
Wei Yang writes:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 07:24:34AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>>Subject doesn't quite conform to conventions. Suggest
>>
>>hmp: Improve how "info migrate" formats capabilities
>
> Thanks
>
>>
>>Wei Yang writes:
>>
>>> Current we put all migration capability in one li
* Wei Yang (richardw.y...@linux.intel.com) wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 07:24:34AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> >Subject doesn't quite conform to conventions. Suggest
> >
> >hmp: Improve how "info migrate" formats capabilities
>
> Thanks
>
> >
> >Wei Yang writes:
> >
> >> Current w
On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 07:24:34AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
>Subject doesn't quite conform to conventions. Suggest
>
>hmp: Improve how "info migrate" formats capabilities
Thanks
>
>Wei Yang writes:
>
>> Current we put all migration capability in one line, which make it hard
>> to rea
Subject doesn't quite conform to conventions. Suggest
hmp: Improve how "info migrate" formats capabilities
Wei Yang writes:
> Current we put all migration capability in one line, which make it hard
> to read them and someone them are missed due to terminal width.
>
> This patch formats it
Current we put all migration capability in one line, which make it hard
to read them and someone them are missed due to terminal width.
This patch formats it to print 4 in one line, which looks like this now:
capabilities:
xbzrle: off rdma-pin-all: offauto-converge:
