On 3/20/2018 3:12 PM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 13:29:24 +0800 "Qin, Chao" > wrote: > >> On 3/20/2018 12:05 AM, Igor
Mammedov wrote: >>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 17:04:49 +0800
chao@linux.intel.com >>> wrote: > >> From: Qin Chao
> / something horribly wrong with mail client u
On Tue, 20 Mar 2018 13:29:24 +0800
"Qin, Chao" wrote:
> On 3/20/2018 12:05 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 17:04:49 +0800 chao@linux.intel.com wrote: > >>
> > From: Qin Chao
/ something horribly wrong with mail client used for reply /
>> @@
> -933,6 +944,9 @@ static int
On 3/20/2018 12:05 AM, Igor Mammedov wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 17:04:49 +0800 chao@linux.intel.com wrote: > >> From: Qin Chao >> >> Emulation of
IA32_APIC_BASE MSR in HAXM is not correct, such as >> bit 8, which is
BSP flag and should be set to 1 for the bootstrap >> processor and set
On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 17:04:49 +0800
chao@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Qin Chao
>
> Emulation of IA32_APIC_BASE MSR in HAXM is not correct, such as bit
> 8, which is BSP flag and should be set to 1 for the bootstrap
> processor and set to 0 for the application processors, but it's set
> to 0
On 19/03/2018 10:04, chao@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Qin Chao
>
> Emulation of IA32_APIC_BASE MSR in HAXM is not correct, such as bit
> 8, which is BSP flag and should be set to 1 for the bootstrap
> processor and set to 0 for the application processors, but it's set
> to 0 for all proces
From: Qin Chao
Emulation of IA32_APIC_BASE MSR in HAXM is not correct, such as bit
8, which is BSP flag and should be set to 1 for the bootstrap
processor and set to 0 for the application processors, but it's set
to 0 for all processors in HAXM. So guest OSes that expect a valid
BSP flag, such as
