On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 3:51 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 05/24/2012 02:42 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
>>
>> Am 24.05.2012 20:36, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
>>>
>>> On 05/24/2012 01:12 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
This discussion looks strange for me.
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not going to commit patches wi
On 05/24/2012 02:42 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
Am 24.05.2012 20:36, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 05/24/2012 01:12 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
This discussion looks strange for me.
I'm not going to commit patches with a Signed-off-by if I know the name is an
alias.
DCO requires the use of a real name.
Am 24.05.2012 20:36, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
On 05/24/2012 01:12 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
This discussion looks strange for me.
I'm not going to commit patches with a Signed-off-by if I know the
name is an alias.
DCO requires the use of a real name. DCO is an important part of
ensuring the
On 05/24/2012 01:12 PM, Stefan Weil wrote:
Am 24.05.2012 15:35, schrieb Andreas Färber:
Am 24.05.2012 04:12, schrieb TeLeMan:
I won't use
my Chinese name because I think it's my privacy.
That exactly is touching the core point: Signed-off-by is about
transparency and taking responsibility for
Am 24.05.2012 15:35, schrieb Andreas Färber:
Am 24.05.2012 04:12, schrieb TeLeMan:
I won't use
my Chinese name because I think it's my privacy.
That exactly is touching the core point: Signed-off-by is about
transparency and taking responsibility for your actions, not hiding in
anonymity. It's
Am 24.05.2012 04:12, schrieb TeLeMan:
> I won't use
> my Chinese name because I think it's my privacy.
That exactly is touching the core point: Signed-off-by is about
transparency and taking responsibility for your actions, not hiding in
anonymity. It's a certification of whom the code came from a
On 2012-05-23 23:00, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-05-23 22:29, TeLeMan wrote:
>> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2012-05-23 13:02, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-05-23 11:11, TeLeMan wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Jan Kiszka
> wrote:
>> On 2012-05-
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-05-23 22:29, TeLeMan wrote:
>> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2012-05-23 13:02, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-05-23 11:11, TeLeMan wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Jan Kiszka
> wrote:
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 4:44 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 05/23/2012 03:28 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 23.05.2012 21:40, schrieb Blue Swirl:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Andreas Färber
wrote:
>
> Am 1
On 2012-05-23 22:29, TeLeMan wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-05-23 13:02, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2012-05-23 11:11, TeLeMan wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-05-23 04:09, TeLeMan wrote:
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 1:36 AM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-05-23 13:02, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-05-23 11:11, TeLeMan wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
On 2012-05-23 04:09, TeLeMan wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>
On 05/23/2012 03:28 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 23.05.2012 21:40, schrieb Blue Swirl:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 18.05.2012 11:49, schrieb TeLeMan:
This breakage was introduced by the commit "memory: make
phy
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:04 PM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 23.05.2012 21:40, schrieb Blue Swirl:
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Am 18.05.2012 11:49, schrieb TeLeMan:
This breakage was introduced by the commit "memory: make
phys_page_find() return an unadj
Am 23.05.2012 21:40, schrieb Blue Swirl:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 18.05.2012 11:49, schrieb TeLeMan:
>>> This breakage was introduced by the commit "memory: make
>>> phys_page_find() return an unadjusted".
>>
>> You seem to have found the origin of your proble
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 18.05.2012 11:49, schrieb TeLeMan:
>> This breakage was introduced by the commit "memory: make
>> phys_page_find() return an unadjusted".
>
> You seem to have found the origin of your problem. If you also mention
> the commit hash in your
On 2012-05-23 13:02, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-05-23 11:11, TeLeMan wrote:
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2012-05-23 04:09, TeLeMan wrote:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 18.05.2012 11:49, schrieb TeLeMan:
>> This breakage
On 2012-05-23 11:11, TeLeMan wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2012-05-23 04:09, TeLeMan wrote:
>>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 18.05.2012 11:49, schrieb TeLeMan:
> This breakage was introduced by the commit "memory: make
>>>
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 7:22 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2012-05-23 04:09, TeLeMan wrote:
>> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Am 18.05.2012 11:49, schrieb TeLeMan:
This breakage was introduced by the commit "memory: make
phys_page_find() return an unadjusted".
On 2012-05-23 04:09, TeLeMan wrote:
> On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
>> Am 18.05.2012 11:49, schrieb TeLeMan:
>>> This breakage was introduced by the commit "memory: make
>>> phys_page_find() return an unadjusted".
>>
>> You seem to have found the origin of your problem. I
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 11:41 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 18.05.2012 11:49, schrieb TeLeMan:
>> This breakage was introduced by the commit "memory: make
>> phys_page_find() return an unadjusted".
>
> You seem to have found the origin of your problem. If you also mention
> the commit hash in you
Am 18.05.2012 11:49, schrieb TeLeMan:
> This breakage was introduced by the commit "memory: make
> phys_page_find() return an unadjusted".
You seem to have found the origin of your problem. If you also mention
the commit hash in your commit message then certain frontends (gitk,
repo.or.cz) will di
On Friday, May 18, 2012, TeLeMan wrote:
> This breakage was introduced by the commit "memory: make
> phys_page_find() return an unadjusted".
>
> Signed-off-by: TeLeMan
> ---
> exec.c |3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
> index 0607c9b..ad
This breakage was introduced by the commit "memory: make
phys_page_find() return an unadjusted".
Signed-off-by: TeLeMan
---
exec.c |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
index 0607c9b..ad99476 100644
--- a/exec.c
+++ b/exec.c
@@ -1475,7 +1475,8 @
23 matches
Mail list logo