On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 09:46:57PM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Am 10.04.2012 21:26, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
> >On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:48:54PM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote:
> >>Commit 7fc8d918b9674c3e9233d6d25da2457345d414a0 removed code from
> >>eepro100.c and replaced it by different code: the
Am 10.04.2012 21:26, schrieb Michael S. Tsirkin:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:48:54PM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote:
Commit 7fc8d918b9674c3e9233d6d25da2457345d414a0 removed code from
eepro100.c and replaced it by different code: the code in net.c
returns bits 31...26, but eepro100 needs bits 7...2.
On 04/11/2012 03:26 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:48:54PM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote:
Commit 7fc8d918b9674c3e9233d6d25da2457345d414a0 removed code from
eepro100.c and replaced it by different code: the code in net.c
returns bits 31...26, but eepro100 needs bits 7...2.
T
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:48:54PM +0200, Stefan Weil wrote:
> Commit 7fc8d918b9674c3e9233d6d25da2457345d414a0 removed code from
> eepro100.c and replaced it by different code: the code in net.c
> returns bits 31...26, but eepro100 needs bits 7...2.
>
> This patch partially reverts 7fc8d918b9674c3
Commit 7fc8d918b9674c3e9233d6d25da2457345d414a0 removed code from
eepro100.c and replaced it by different code: the code in net.c
returns bits 31...26, but eepro100 needs bits 7...2.
This patch partially reverts 7fc8d918b9674c3e9233d6d25da2457345d414a0.
To avoid future problems, I renamed the func