On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 11:52:20AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 20.06.2011 11:40, schrieb Wen Congyang:
> > At 06/20/2011 05:10 PM, Kevin Wolf Write:
> >> Am 17.06.2011 03:33, schrieb Wen Congyang:
> >>> If !s->clock_enabled or !rtl8139_receiver_enabled(s), it means that
> >>> the nic will drop al
Am 20.06.2011 11:40, schrieb Wen Congyang:
> At 06/20/2011 05:10 PM, Kevin Wolf Write:
>> Am 17.06.2011 03:33, schrieb Wen Congyang:
>>> If !s->clock_enabled or !rtl8139_receiver_enabled(s), it means that
>>> the nic will drop all packets from host. So qemu will keep getting
>>> packets from host a
At 06/20/2011 05:10 PM, Kevin Wolf Write:
> Am 17.06.2011 03:33, schrieb Wen Congyang:
>> If !s->clock_enabled or !rtl8139_receiver_enabled(s), it means that
>> the nic will drop all packets from host. So qemu will keep getting
>> packets from host and wasting CPU on dropping packets. This seems
>>
Am 17.06.2011 03:33, schrieb Wen Congyang:
> If !s->clock_enabled or !rtl8139_receiver_enabled(s), it means that
> the nic will drop all packets from host. So qemu will keep getting
> packets from host and wasting CPU on dropping packets. This seems
> worse than packets that should be dropped but a
If !s->clock_enabled or !rtl8139_receiver_enabled(s), it means that
the nic will drop all packets from host. So qemu will keep getting
packets from host and wasting CPU on dropping packets. This seems
worse than packets that should be dropped but aren't.
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang
---
hw/rtl81
