On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 06/07/2015 13:42, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 07/06/2015 09:43 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 05/07/2015 23:08, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
There was a complicated subtractive arithmetic for determining the
padding on
On 06/07/2015 13:42, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 07/06/2015 09:43 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 05/07/2015 23:08, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>>> There was a complicated subtractive arithmetic for determining the
>>> padding on the CPUTLBEntry structure. Simplify this with a union.
>>>
>>>
On 07/06/2015 09:43 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 05/07/2015 23:08, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
There was a complicated subtractive arithmetic for determining the
padding on the CPUTLBEntry structure. Simplify this with a union.
Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite
---
include/exec/cpu-defs.h | 23
On 06/07/2015 10:58, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>> > Which compiler version started implementing anonymous structs?
>> >
> ISO C11 standardises it apparently. But various parts of the tree use
> them now. target-arm/cpu.h, target-i386/kvm.c,
> linux-user/syscall_defs.h and linux-headers/linux/kvm.h
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 1:43 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 05/07/2015 23:08, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
>> There was a complicated subtractive arithmetic for determining the
>> padding on the CPUTLBEntry structure. Simplify this with a union.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite
>> ---
>> inc
On 05/07/2015 23:08, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> There was a complicated subtractive arithmetic for determining the
> padding on the CPUTLBEntry structure. Simplify this with a union.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite
> ---
> include/exec/cpu-defs.h | 23 ---
> 1 file cha
There was a complicated subtractive arithmetic for determining the
padding on the CPUTLBEntry structure. Simplify this with a union.
Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite
---
include/exec/cpu-defs.h | 23 ---
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/
