Stefan Hajnoczi writes:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 04:10:14PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>> Am 04.09.2014 um 15:51 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
>> > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 06:07:32AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
>> > > On 09/04/2014 02:58 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> > > > On-disk structures shoul
Am 04.09.2014 um 17:43 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 04:10:14PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > Am 04.09.2014 um 15:51 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 06:07:32AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> > > > On 09/04/2014 02:58 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 04:10:14PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 04.09.2014 um 15:51 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 06:07:32AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> > > On 09/04/2014 02:58 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > > On-disk structures should be marked packed so the compil
Am 04.09.2014 um 15:51 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 06:07:32AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 09/04/2014 02:58 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > > On-disk structures should be marked packed so the compiler does not
> > > insert padding for field alignment. Padding shoul
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 06:07:32AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 09/04/2014 02:58 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> > On-disk structures should be marked packed so the compiler does not
> > insert padding for field alignment. Padding should be explicit so
> > on-disk layout is obvious and we don't rely
At 2014-09-04 08:07:32, "Eric Blake" wrote:
>On 09/04/2014 02:58 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On-disk structures should be marked packed so the compiler does not
>> insert padding for field alignment. Padding should be explicit so
>> on-disk layout is obvious and we don't rely on the architect
On 09/04/2014 02:58 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On-disk structures should be marked packed so the compiler does not
> insert padding for field alignment. Padding should be explicit so
> on-disk layout is obvious and we don't rely on the architecture-specific
> ABI for alignment rules.
>
> The pa
The Thursday 04 Sep 2014 à 09:58:41 (+0100), Stefan Hajnoczi wrote :
> On-disk structures should be marked packed so the compiler does not
> insert padding for field alignment. Padding should be explicit so
> on-disk layout is obvious and we don't rely on the architecture-specific
> ABI for alignm
Am 04.09.2014 um 10:58 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> On-disk structures should be marked packed so the compiler does not
> insert padding for field alignment. Padding should be explicit so
> on-disk layout is obvious and we don't rely on the architecture-specific
> ABI for alignment rules.
>
On-disk structures should be marked packed so the compiler does not
insert padding for field alignment. Padding should be explicit so
on-disk layout is obvious and we don't rely on the architecture-specific
ABI for alignment rules.
The pahole(1) diff shows that the padding is now explicit and off
10 matches
Mail list logo