On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 05:44:31PM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Determining the size of a field is useful when you don't have a struct
> variable handy. Open-coding this is ugly.
>
> This patch adds the sizeof_field() macro, which is similar to
> typeof_field(). Existing instances are updated
On Thu, Jun 14, 2018 at 9:33 PM, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On 06/14/2018 04:17 PM, John Snow wrote:
>> On 06/14/2018 12:44 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>> Determining the size of a field is useful when you don't have a struct
>>> variable handy. Open-coding this is ugly.
>>>
>>> This patch a
On 06/14/2018 04:17 PM, John Snow wrote:
> On 06/14/2018 12:44 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> Determining the size of a field is useful when you don't have a struct
>> variable handy. Open-coding this is ugly.
>>
>> This patch adds the sizeof_field() macro, which is similar to
>> typeof_field(). E
On 06/14/2018 12:44 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> Determining the size of a field is useful when you don't have a struct
> variable handy. Open-coding this is ugly.
>
> This patch adds the sizeof_field() macro, which is similar to
> typeof_field(). Existing instances are updated to use the mac
Determining the size of a field is useful when you don't have a struct
variable handy. Open-coding this is ugly.
This patch adds the sizeof_field() macro, which is similar to
typeof_field(). Existing instances are updated to use the macro.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi
---
include/hw/xen/io/
