On 5 July 2014 02:53, Stefano Stabellini
wrote:
> I admit that this small series was lost in my mailbox. I had an older
> version of the build fixes patch and started from there again.
> Are you OK with v2 as per your link? It applies almost as is, except for
> the renaming xen-all.c -> xen-hvm.c.
On Sat, 5 Jul 2014, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 4 July 2014 19:47, Stefano Stabellini
> wrote:
> > Fixes to build QEMU with Xen support on ARM and ARM64. Most fixes are
> > due to the fact that xen_pfn_t is 64-bit sized on arm32, while it is an
> > unsigned long on x86_32.
> > Although QEMU can be c
On 4 July 2014 19:47, Stefano Stabellini
wrote:
> Fixes to build QEMU with Xen support on ARM and ARM64. Most fixes are
> due to the fact that xen_pfn_t is 64-bit sized on arm32, while it is an
> unsigned long on x86_32.
> Although QEMU can be compiled with full emulation support, on ARM we
> only
Fixes to build QEMU with Xen support on ARM and ARM64. Most fixes are
due to the fact that xen_pfn_t is 64-bit sized on arm32, while it is an
unsigned long on x86_32.
Although QEMU can be compiled with full emulation support, on ARM we
only care about the PV backends.
Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabel
