On 17 January 2017 at 15:20, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Di, 2017-01-17 at 10:44 +, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 17 January 2017 at 08:20, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> > On Mo, 2017-01-16 at 18:35 +, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> >> On 11 January 2017 at 10:58, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> >> > No need to g
On Di, 2017-01-17 at 10:44 +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 17 January 2017 at 08:20, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > On Mo, 2017-01-16 at 18:35 +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 11 January 2017 at 10:58, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >> > No need to go the indirect route with a bitfield and mapping the bits
On 17 January 2017 at 08:20, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On Mo, 2017-01-16 at 18:35 +, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 11 January 2017 at 10:58, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> > No need to go the indirect route with a bitfield and mapping the bits to
>> > INPUT_BUTTON_*. We can use a bool array and INPUT_BUT
On Mo, 2017-01-16 at 18:35 +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 11 January 2017 at 10:58, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > No need to go the indirect route with a bitfield and mapping the bits to
> > INPUT_BUTTON_*. We can use a bool array and INPUT_BUTTON_* directly
> > instead.
> >
> > Untested, not even c
On 11 January 2017 at 10:58, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> No need to go the indirect route with a bitfield and mapping the bits to
> INPUT_BUTTON_*. We can use a bool array and INPUT_BUTTON_* directly
> instead.
>
> Untested, not even compiled, due to lack of a osx^Wmacos machine.
> Test results are ve
No need to go the indirect route with a bitfield and mapping the bits to
INPUT_BUTTON_*. We can use a bool array and INPUT_BUTTON_* directly
instead.
Untested, not even compiled, due to lack of a osx^Wmacos machine.
Test results are very welcome.
Signed-off-by: Gerd Hoffmann
---
ui/cocoa.m | 4
