On 22/02/2018 22:58, Eric Blake wrote:
> Sometimes, we want to refer to really long URLs, but checkpatch
> balks, and we have to manually bypass the check. URL shorterners
> may be nice at reducing long links, but it's hard to guarantee the
> shortened link will live as long as the real target, an
On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 03:58:38PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> Sometimes, we want to refer to really long URLs, but checkpatch
> balks, and we have to manually bypass the check. URL shorterners
> may be nice at reducing long links, but it's hard to guarantee the
> shortened link will live as long a
On 02/22/2018 03:58 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
Sometimes, we want to refer to really long URLs, but checkpatch
balks, and we have to manually bypass the check. URL shorterners
s/shorterners/shorteners/
(Is it bad when I spell-check my own patches?)
may be nice at reducing long links, but it's ha
Sometimes, we want to refer to really long URLs, but checkpatch
balks, and we have to manually bypass the check. URL shorterners
may be nice at reducing long links, but it's hard to guarantee the
shortened link will live as long as the real target, and it is
also nice to see the original target wi
