On 3 June 2014 19:51, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Trying to override the implementations of g_malloc and g_free is
> a really bad idea -- it means statically linked builds fail to
> link (because of the multiple definitions provided by this file
> and by glib), and non-statically linked builds segfault
On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 00:51 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Trying to override the implementations of g_malloc and g_free is
> a really bad idea -- it means statically linked builds fail to
> link (because of the multiple definitions provided by this file
> and by glib), and non-statically linked bui
Trying to override the implementations of g_malloc and g_free is
a really bad idea -- it means statically linked builds fail to
link (because of the multiple definitions provided by this file
and by glib), and non-statically linked builds segfault as soon
as they try to do anything more complicated
