On 26.10.2015 22:34, John Snow wrote:
>
>
> On 10/26/2015 05:18 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
>> On 26.10.2015 19:12, John Snow wrote:
>>> For more complex BDS trees that can be created under normal circumstances,
>>> we lose the ability to issue query commands because of our inability to
>>> re-construct
On 10/26/2015 05:18 PM, Max Reitz wrote:
> On 26.10.2015 19:12, John Snow wrote:
>> For more complex BDS trees that can be created under normal circumstances,
>> we lose the ability to issue query commands because of our inability to
>> re-construct the absolute filename.
>>
>> Instead, omit this
On 26.10.2015 19:12, John Snow wrote:
> For more complex BDS trees that can be created under normal circumstances,
> we lose the ability to issue query commands because of our inability to
> re-construct the absolute filename.
>
> Instead, omit this field when it is a problem and present as much i
On 10/26/2015 12:12 PM, John Snow wrote:
> For more complex BDS trees that can be created under normal circumstances,
> we lose the ability to issue query commands because of our inability to
> re-construct the absolute filename.
>
> Instead, omit this field when it is a problem and present as muc
For more complex BDS trees that can be created under normal circumstances,
we lose the ability to issue query commands because of our inability to
re-construct the absolute filename.
Instead, omit this field when it is a problem and present as much information
as we can.
This will change the expe
