Kevin Wolf writes:
> Coverity doesn't like that the return value of bdrv_check_update_perm()
> stays unused only in this place (CID 1399710).
>
> Even if checking local_err should be equivalent to checking ret < 0,
> let's switch to using the return value to be more consistent (and in
> case of a
On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 at 14:27, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>
> Coverity doesn't like that the return value of bdrv_check_update_perm()
> stays unused only in this place (CID 1399710).
>
> Even if checking local_err should be equivalent to checking ret < 0,
> let's switch to using the return value to be more
Coverity doesn't like that the return value of bdrv_check_update_perm()
stays unused only in this place (CID 1399710).
Even if checking local_err should be equivalent to checking ret < 0,
let's switch to using the return value to be more consistent (and in
case of a bug somewhere down the call cha
