On Mon, 06/23 07:17, Benoît Canet wrote:
> The Monday 23 Jun 2014 à 12:32:30 (+0800), Fam Zheng wrote :
> > On Sat, 06/21 17:40, Benoît Canet wrote:
> > > The Saturday 21 Jun 2014 à 17:39:11 (+0200), Benoît Canet wrote :
> > > > We still have the issue of unlocking the bottom BDS when a subtree is
The Monday 23 Jun 2014 à 12:32:30 (+0800), Fam Zheng wrote :
> On Sat, 06/21 17:40, Benoît Canet wrote:
> > The Saturday 21 Jun 2014 à 17:39:11 (+0200), Benoît Canet wrote :
> > > We still have the issue of unlocking the bottom BDS when a subtree is
> > > detached
> > > from the graphs by a swap.
On Sat, 06/21 17:40, Benoît Canet wrote:
> The Saturday 21 Jun 2014 à 17:39:11 (+0200), Benoît Canet wrote :
> > We still have the issue of unlocking the bottom BDS when a subtree is
> > detached
> > from the graphs by a swap. (It does happen in my drive-mirror arbitrary node
> > replacement serie
The Saturday 21 Jun 2014 à 17:39:11 (+0200), Benoît Canet wrote :
> The Saturday 21 Jun 2014 à 23:15:19 (+0800), Fam Zheng wrote :
> > On Sat, 06/21 12:45, Benoît Canet wrote:
> > > The Saturday 21 Jun 2014 à 16:53:58 (+0800), Fam Zheng wrote :
> > > > On Fri, 06/20 09:30, Eric Blake wrote:
> > > >
The Saturday 21 Jun 2014 à 23:15:19 (+0800), Fam Zheng wrote :
> On Sat, 06/21 12:45, Benoît Canet wrote:
> > The Saturday 21 Jun 2014 à 16:53:58 (+0800), Fam Zheng wrote :
> > > On Fri, 06/20 09:30, Eric Blake wrote:
> > > > On 06/19/2014 11:01 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 06/19 22:20, B
On Sat, 06/21 12:45, Benoît Canet wrote:
> The Saturday 21 Jun 2014 à 16:53:58 (+0800), Fam Zheng wrote :
> > On Fri, 06/20 09:30, Eric Blake wrote:
> > > On 06/19/2014 11:01 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 06/19 22:20, Benoît Canet wrote:
> > > >> The Thursday 19 Jun 2014 à 14:13:20 (-0600),
The Saturday 21 Jun 2014 à 16:53:58 (+0800), Fam Zheng wrote :
> On Fri, 06/20 09:30, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 06/19/2014 11:01 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > > On Thu, 06/19 22:20, Benoît Canet wrote:
> > >> The Thursday 19 Jun 2014 à 14:13:20 (-0600), Eric Blake wrote :
> > >>> On 06/19/2014 02:01 PM,
On Fri, 06/20 09:30, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 06/19/2014 11:01 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > On Thu, 06/19 22:20, Benoît Canet wrote:
> >> The Thursday 19 Jun 2014 à 14:13:20 (-0600), Eric Blake wrote :
> >>> On 06/19/2014 02:01 PM, Benoît Canet wrote:
> As the code will start to operate on arbitratr
On 06/19/2014 11:01 PM, Fam Zheng wrote:
> On Thu, 06/19 22:20, Benoît Canet wrote:
>> The Thursday 19 Jun 2014 à 14:13:20 (-0600), Eric Blake wrote :
>>> On 06/19/2014 02:01 PM, Benoît Canet wrote:
As the code will start to operate on arbitratry nodes we need the op
blocker
>>>
>>> s/ar
On Thu, 06/19 22:20, Benoît Canet wrote:
> The Thursday 19 Jun 2014 à 14:13:20 (-0600), Eric Blake wrote :
> > On 06/19/2014 02:01 PM, Benoît Canet wrote:
> > > As the code will start to operate on arbitratry nodes we need the op
> > > blocker
> >
> > s/arbitratry/arbitrary/
> >
> > > to recursi
The Thursday 19 Jun 2014 à 14:26:04 (-0600), Eric Blake wrote :
> On 06/19/2014 02:20 PM, Benoît Canet wrote:
>
> >> This unconditionally removes all blockers of type op of the subtree
> >>
> >> Yikes - is that really what we want? Or do we need to start doing
> >> blocker reference counting?
>
On 06/19/2014 02:20 PM, Benoît Canet wrote:
>> This unconditionally removes all blockers of type op of the subtree
>>
>> Yikes - is that really what we want? Or do we need to start doing
>> blocker reference counting?
>>
>> Consider:
>>
>> base <- snap1 <- active
>>
>> Looking at Jeff's proposal
The Thursday 19 Jun 2014 à 14:13:20 (-0600), Eric Blake wrote :
> On 06/19/2014 02:01 PM, Benoît Canet wrote:
> > As the code will start to operate on arbitratry nodes we need the op blocker
>
> s/arbitratry/arbitrary/
>
> > to recursively block or unblock whole BDS subtrees.
> >
> > Also add a
On 06/19/2014 02:01 PM, Benoît Canet wrote:
> As the code will start to operate on arbitratry nodes we need the op blocker
s/arbitratry/arbitrary/
> to recursively block or unblock whole BDS subtrees.
>
> Also add a function to reset all blocker from a BDS.
>
> This patch also take care of chan
As the code will start to operate on arbitratry nodes we need the op blocker
to recursively block or unblock whole BDS subtrees.
Also add a function to reset all blocker from a BDS.
This patch also take care of changing blocker user so they are not broken.
Signed-off-by: Benoit Canet
---
block
15 matches
Mail list logo