On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 03:51:13PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> One of the major reasons for doing something new for -blockdev and
> blockdev-add was that the old block layer code parses filenames instead
> of just taking them literally. So we should really leave it untouched
> when it's passing usin
Am 10.07.2013 um 19:09 hat Eric Blake geschrieben:
> On 07/10/2013 07:51 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> > One of the major reasons for doing something new for -blockdev and
> > blockdev-add was that the old block layer code parses filenames instead
> > of just taking them literally. So we should really le
On 07/10/2013 07:51 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> One of the major reasons for doing something new for -blockdev and
> blockdev-add was that the old block layer code parses filenames instead
> of just taking them literally. So we should really leave it untouched
> when it's passing using the new interfac
One of the major reasons for doing something new for -blockdev and
blockdev-add was that the old block layer code parses filenames instead
of just taking them literally. So we should really leave it untouched
when it's passing using the new interfaces (like -drive
file.filename=...).
This allows o
