Am 25.01.2013 19:13, schrieb Eric Blake:
> On 01/25/2013 11:10 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
>>
>> On Jan 25, 2013, at 1:18 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>>
>>> Am 24.01.2013 19:00, schrieb Vishvananda Ishaya:
The qmp monitor command to mirror a disk was passing -1 for size
along with the disk's
On 01/25/2013 11:10 AM, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
>
> On Jan 25, 2013, at 1:18 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
>
>> Am 24.01.2013 19:00, schrieb Vishvananda Ishaya:
>>> The qmp monitor command to mirror a disk was passing -1 for size
>>> along with the disk's backing file. This size of the resulting disk
On Jan 25, 2013, at 1:18 AM, Kevin Wolf wrote:
> Am 24.01.2013 19:00, schrieb Vishvananda Ishaya:
>> The qmp monitor command to mirror a disk was passing -1 for size
>> along with the disk's backing file. This size of the resulting disk
>> is the size of the backing file, which is incorrect if t
Am 24.01.2013 19:00, schrieb Vishvananda Ishaya:
> The qmp monitor command to mirror a disk was passing -1 for size
> along with the disk's backing file. This size of the resulting disk
> is the size of the backing file, which is incorrect if the disk
> has been resized. Therefore we should always
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:00:40AM -0800, Vishvananda Ishaya wrote:
> The qmp monitor command to mirror a disk was passing -1 for size
> along with the disk's backing file. This size of the resulting disk
> is the size of the backing file, which is incorrect if the disk
> has been resized. Therefor
The qmp monitor command to mirror a disk was passing -1 for size
along with the disk's backing file. This size of the resulting disk
is the size of the backing file, which is incorrect if the disk
has been resized. Therefore we should always pass in the size of
the current disk.
Signed-off-by: Vis
