On 09.03.2012, at 20:03, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 09.03.2012 19:22, schrieb Alexander Graf:
>>
>> On 09.03.2012, at 17:40, Mark Langsdorf wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/09/2012 10:13 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 9 March 2012 15:57, Mark Langsdorf wrote:
> Since the ram_size field of arm_boot_in
Am 09.03.2012 19:22, schrieb Alexander Graf:
>
> On 09.03.2012, at 17:40, Mark Langsdorf wrote:
>
>> On 03/09/2012 10:13 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 9 March 2012 15:57, Mark Langsdorf wrote:
Since the ram_size field of arm_boot_info is only an int, don't set
that field to more than
On 09.03.2012, at 17:40, Mark Langsdorf wrote:
> On 03/09/2012 10:13 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 9 March 2012 15:57, Mark Langsdorf wrote:
>>> Since the ram_size field of arm_boot_info is only an int, don't set
>>> that field to more than INT_MAX. Signed vs unsigned comparison
>>> overruns ar
On 03/09/2012 10:13 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 9 March 2012 15:57, Mark Langsdorf wrote:
>> Since the ram_size field of arm_boot_info is only an int, don't set
>> that field to more than INT_MAX. Signed vs unsigned comparison
>> overruns are possible otherwise.
>
> Can't we just make arm_boot_
On 9 March 2012 15:57, Mark Langsdorf wrote:
> Since the ram_size field of arm_boot_info is only an int, don't set
> that field to more than INT_MAX. Signed vs unsigned comparison
> overruns are possible otherwise.
Can't we just make arm_boot_info.ram_size a uint32_t (propagating through
signedne
Since the ram_size field of arm_boot_info is only an int, don't set
that field to more than INT_MAX. Signed vs unsigned comparison
overruns are possible otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Mark Langsdorf
---
hw/highbank.c |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/highban
