On Dec 13, 2007 3:15 AM, Thayne Harbaugh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 01:21 +, Paul Brook wrote:
> > > - It would be good to limit the changes in the CPU emulation code to
> > > handle the TLS. For example, on MIPS, the TLS register must not be
> > > stored in the CPU
On Thu, Dec 13, 2007 at 01:21:03AM +, Paul Brook wrote:
> I disagree. The TLS register is part of the CPU state. On many machines
> (including ARMv6 CPUs) it's an actual CPU register. I'm fairly sure the same
> is true for recent MIPS revisions.
That's correct, though I don't know if there i
Paul Brook wrote:
- It would be good to limit the changes in the CPU emulation code to
handle the TLS. For example, on MIPS, the TLS register must not be
stored in the CPU state. Same for ARM.
I disagree. The TLS register is part of the CPU state. On many machines
(including ARMv6 CPUs) it's a
On Thu, 2007-12-13 at 01:21 +, Paul Brook wrote:
> > - It would be good to limit the changes in the CPU emulation code to
> > handle the TLS. For example, on MIPS, the TLS register must not be
> > stored in the CPU state. Same for ARM.
>
> I disagree. The TLS register is part of the CPU state
> - It would be good to limit the changes in the CPU emulation code to
> handle the TLS. For example, on MIPS, the TLS register must not be
> stored in the CPU state. Same for ARM.
I disagree. The TLS register is part of the CPU state. On many machines
(including ARMv6 CPUs) it's an actual CPU re
Thayne Harbaugh wrote:
> I believe Paul Brook did the original patch for arm eabi TLS. The patch
> has bounced around for a bit but hasn't been applied. We've been using
> this patch for a while and have tweaked it to be a bit more correct as
> far as code organization.
>
> Please let me know wh
On Wednesday 12 December 2007, Thayne Harbaugh wrote:
> I believe Paul Brook did the original patch for arm eabi TLS. The patch
> has bounced around for a bit but hasn't been applied. We've been using
> this patch for a while and have tweaked it to be a bit more correct as
> far as code organizat
I believe Paul Brook did the original patch for arm eabi TLS. The patch
has bounced around for a bit but hasn't been applied. We've been using
this patch for a while and have tweaked it to be a bit more correct as
far as code organization.
Please let me know what else should be improved for this
