On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 23 December 2012 16:34, Christoffer Dall
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Peter Maydell
>> wrote:
>>> On 22 December 2012 19:03, Christoffer Dall
>>> wrote:
The start bit should only be set to indicate that a function
On 24 January 2013 15:43, Christoffer Dall
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
>> OK, if you've compared with hardware I'm happy.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell
>>
> Will you include this with other patches for upstream, or?
Yes, I'll put it in my arm-devs.next t
On 23 December 2012 16:34, Christoffer Dall
wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Peter Maydell
> wrote:
>> On 22 December 2012 19:03, Christoffer Dall
>> wrote:
>>> The start bit should only be set to indicate that a function call is
>>> underway, right now. When done with function, clear
On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 6:01 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 22 December 2012 19:03, Christoffer Dall
> wrote:
>> The start bit should only be set to indicate that a function call is
>> underway, right now. When done with function, clear it.
>
> Looks plausible but I'd like a crosscheck that this
On 22 December 2012 19:03, Christoffer Dall
wrote:
> The start bit should only be set to indicate that a function call is
> underway, right now. When done with function, clear it.
Looks plausible but I'd like a crosscheck that this is how the hardware
really behaves.
-- PMM
The start bit should only be set to indicate that a function call is
underway, right now. When done with function, clear it.
Cc: Peter Maydell
Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall
---
hw/arm_sysctl.c |1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/hw/arm_sysctl.c b/hw/arm_sysctl.c
index 58eb
