On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 09:35:12AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 02/10/2010 04:04 AM, Riku Voipio wrote:
> >On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 10:46:32AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> >>Ping?
> >
> >The linux-user side of the patch seems fine, but the target-alpha
> >code doesn't apply. Either some
Move userland PALcode handling into linux-user main loop so that
we can send signals from there. This also makes alpha_palcode.c
system-level only, so don't build it for userland. Add defines
for GENTRAP PALcall mapping to signals.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
Makefile.target
On 02/10/2010 04:04 AM, Riku Voipio wrote:
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 10:46:32AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
Ping?
The linux-user side of the patch seems fine, but the target-alpha
code doesn't apply. Either something has changed upstream or this
depends on one of your other alpha patches. If
On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 10:46:32AM -0800, Richard Henderson wrote:
> Ping?
The linux-user side of the patch seems fine, but the target-alpha
code doesn't apply. Either something has changed upstream or this
depends on one of your other alpha patches. If the latter case, I
don't mind if this is app
Ping?
r~
On 01/04/2010 03:17 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
Move userland PALcode handling into linux-user main loop so that
we can send signals from there. This also makes alpha_palcode.c
system-level only, so don't build it for userland. Add defines
for GENTRAP PALcall mapping to signals.
Si
Move userland PALcode handling into linux-user main loop so that
we can send signals from there. This also makes alpha_palcode.c
system-level only, so don't build it for userland. Add defines
for GENTRAP PALcall mapping to signals.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson
---
Makefile.target
