On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 02:33:46PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> >> shouldn't last one still be uint16_t?
> >
> > It results in an error by type_check_pointer.
>
> You are right. We are just lying. Will think about how to fix this
> properly (basically move the whole thi
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
>> shouldn't last one still be uint16_t?
>
> It results in an error by type_check_pointer.
You are right. We are just lying. Will think about how to fix this
properly (basically move the whole thing to a uint8_t array, and work
from there.
>> I guess that on ich9, GPE bec
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 06:26:08PM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> > It's vmstate parameter was wrong. This patch fixes it.
> >
> > Reported-by: Avi Kivity
> > Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata
> > ---
> > hw/acpi_piix4.c |3 +--
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 del
Isaku Yamahata wrote:
> It's vmstate parameter was wrong. This patch fixes it.
>
> Reported-by: Avi Kivity
> Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata
> ---
> hw/acpi_piix4.c |3 +--
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/acpi_piix4.c b/hw/acpi_piix4.c
> index 96f5222..3
It's vmstate parameter was wrong. This patch fixes it.
Reported-by: Avi Kivity
Signed-off-by: Isaku Yamahata
---
hw/acpi_piix4.c |3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/acpi_piix4.c b/hw/acpi_piix4.c
index 96f5222..3a8fece 100644
--- a/hw/acpi_piix4.c
+++ b
