On 9 July 2012 17:50, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 02:32:44PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> From: "Richard W.M. Jones"
>>
>> glibc 2.16 will remove the undocumented definition of 'struct siginfo'
>> from .
>>
>> This change is already present in glibc 2.15.90, so qemu
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 02:32:44PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> From: "Richard W.M. Jones"
>
> glibc 2.16 will remove the undocumented definition of 'struct siginfo'
> from .
>
> This change is already present in glibc 2.15.90, so qemu compilation
> of certain targets (eg. cris-user) break
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 03:16:12PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 5 July 2012 14:32, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > From: "Richard W.M. Jones"
> >
> > glibc 2.16 will remove the undocumented definition of 'struct siginfo'
> > from .
>
> Progress marches on, trampling all in its wake.
Hey, don'
On 5 July 2012 14:32, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> From: "Richard W.M. Jones"
>
> glibc 2.16 will remove the undocumented definition of 'struct siginfo'
> from .
Progress marches on, trampling all in its wake.
> This change is already present in glibc 2.15.90, so qemu compilation
> of certain ta
From: "Richard W.M. Jones"
glibc 2.16 will remove the undocumented definition of 'struct siginfo'
from .
This change is already present in glibc 2.15.90, so qemu compilation
of certain targets (eg. cris-user) breaks.
This struct was always typedef'd to be the same as 'siginfo_t' which
is what P
