On 14/12/18 13:21, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Our command line interface is really quite overcrowded, we should avoid
> duplicated options that do the same thing in just a slightly different
> way. "-accel hax" is shorter and more generic that "-enable-hax", so
> there is really no real usage for the lat
On 2018-12-14 13:21, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Our command line interface is really quite overcrowded, we should avoid
> duplicated options that do the same thing in just a slightly different
> way. "-accel hax" is shorter and more generic that "-enable-hax", so
> there is really no real usage for the l
On 12/14/18 1:21 PM, Thomas Huth wrote:
> Our command line interface is really quite overcrowded, we should avoid
> duplicated options that do the same thing in just a slightly different
> way. "-accel hax" is shorter and more generic that "-enable-hax", so
> there is really no real usage for the l
Our command line interface is really quite overcrowded, we should avoid
duplicated options that do the same thing in just a slightly different
way. "-accel hax" is shorter and more generic that "-enable-hax", so
there is really no real usage for the latter option. "-enable-hax" has
been deprecated
