On 12/12/2011 03:35 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 12/12/2011 05:36 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Even for files are licensed GPLv2-only, let's not play catch with
ourselves, and explicitly declare that future contributions to those
files will also be available as "any later version".
Signed-off-by
On 12/12/2011 05:36 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Even for files are licensed GPLv2-only, let's not play catch with
ourselves, and explicitly declare that future contributions to those
files will also be available as "any later version".
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
So where do we stand with th
On 10/21/2011 09:03 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Even for files are licensed GPLv2-only, let's not play catch with
ourselves, and explicitly declare that future contributions to those
files will also be available as "any later version".
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
So where do we stand with this?
Am 21.10.2011 16:11, schrieb Anthony Liguori:
> On 10/21/2011 09:03 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Even for files are licensed GPLv2-only, let's not play catch with
>> ourselves, and explicitly declare that future contributions to those
>> files will also be available as "any later version".
>>
>> Sig
On 10/21/2011 04:11 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Otherwise I'm a bit concerned about ambiguity here. Let's say we have
to backport a fit to stable, we need to pull in this new copyright
statement.
But then what if we later discovered we need to pull in a fix from
before 10/25. That will appear
On 10/21/2011 09:03 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Even for files are licensed GPLv2-only, let's not play catch with
ourselves, and explicitly declare that future contributions to those
files will also be available as "any later version".
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
diff --git a/roms/SLOF b/roms/SLOF
Even for files are licensed GPLv2-only, let's not play catch with
ourselves, and explicitly declare that future contributions to those
files will also be available as "any later version".
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
aio.c |2 ++
block-migration.c |2 ++
