On 8 November 2018 at 13:41, Peter Maydell wrote:
> In practice for most of the more-or-less orphan Arm board models,
> I will review patches and put them in via the target-arm tree.
> So list myself as an "Odd Fixes" status maintainer for them.
>
> This commit downgrades these boards to "Odd Fixe
On 15 November 2018 at 09:51, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Alistair Francis writes:
>
>> On 14/11/2018 3:12 am, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 13 November 2018 at 20:10, Alistair Francis wrote:
These two and the Xilinx boards seem a little out of place in this
patch. I agree they probably aren'
Alistair Francis writes:
> On 14/11/2018 3:12 am, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 13 November 2018 at 20:10, Alistair Francis wrote:
>>> These two and the Xilinx boards seem a little out of place in this
>>> patch. I agree they probably aren't maintained as well as they should
>>> be, but the patch
On 14/11/2018 3:12 am, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 13 November 2018 at 20:10, Alistair Francis wrote:
These two and the Xilinx boards seem a little out of place in this
patch. I agree they probably aren't maintained as well as they should
be, but the patch talks about orphaned boards and these four
On 14 November 2018 at 11:23, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:13 PM Peter Maydell
> wrote:
>> On 13 November 2018 at 20:10, Alistair Francis wrote:
>> > These two and the Xilinx boards seem a little out of place in this
>> > patch. I agree they probably aren't maintai
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:13 PM Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 13 November 2018 at 20:10, Alistair Francis wrote:
> > These two and the Xilinx boards seem a little out of place in this
> > patch. I agree they probably aren't maintained as well as they should
> > be, but the patch talks about orphaned
On 13 November 2018 at 20:10, Alistair Francis wrote:
> These two and the Xilinx boards seem a little out of place in this
> patch. I agree they probably aren't maintained as well as they should
> be, but the patch talks about orphaned boards and these four all have
> active QEMU maintainers liste
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 5:41 AM Peter Maydell wrote:
>
> In practice for most of the more-or-less orphan Arm board models,
> I will review patches and put them in via the target-arm tree.
> So list myself as an "Odd Fixes" status maintainer for them.
>
> This commit downgrades these boards to "Odd
On 8 November 2018 at 14:43, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 2018-11-08 14:41, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> In practice for most of the more-or-less orphan Arm board models,
>> I will review patches and put them in via the target-arm tree.
>> So list myself as an "Odd Fixes" status maintainer for them.
>>
>> T
On 2018-11-08 14:41, Peter Maydell wrote:
> In practice for most of the more-or-less orphan Arm board models,
> I will review patches and put them in via the target-arm tree.
> So list myself as an "Odd Fixes" status maintainer for them.
>
> This commit downgrades these boards to "Odd Fixes":
> *
On 8/11/18 14:41, Peter Maydell wrote:
In practice for most of the more-or-less orphan Arm board models,
I will review patches and put them in via the target-arm tree.
So list myself as an "Odd Fixes" status maintainer for them.
This commit downgrades these boards to "Odd Fixes":
* Allwinner-A
In practice for most of the more-or-less orphan Arm board models,
I will review patches and put them in via the target-arm tree.
So list myself as an "Odd Fixes" status maintainer for them.
This commit downgrades these boards to "Odd Fixes":
* Allwinner-A10
* Exynos
* Calxeda Highbank
* Canon
12 matches
Mail list logo
