Currently, x86_64-softmmu qemu segfaults when trying to use > 4095M memsize.
This patch adds a simple check and error message (much like the 2047 limit on
32-bit hosts) on ram_size in the control path after we determine we're
not using kvm
Upstream qemu-kvm is affected if using the -no-kvm option;
On Thu, Mar 04, 2010 at 03:34:34PM -0600, Ryan Harper wrote:
> * Aurelien Jarno [2010-03-04 15:27]:
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 06:02:15PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > Ryan Harper a écrit :
> > > > Currently, x86_64-softmmu qemu segfaults when trying to use > 4095M
> > > > memsize.
> > > >
* Aurelien Jarno [2010-03-04 15:27]:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 06:02:15PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > Ryan Harper a écrit :
> > > Currently, x86_64-softmmu qemu segfaults when trying to use > 4095M
> > > memsize.
> > > This patch adds a simple check and error message (much like the 2047
> >
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 06:02:15PM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Ryan Harper a écrit :
> > Currently, x86_64-softmmu qemu segfaults when trying to use > 4095M memsize.
> > This patch adds a simple check and error message (much like the 2047 limit
> > on
> > 32-bit hosts) on ram_size in the contro
* Aurelien Jarno [2010-02-23 11:37]:
> Ryan Harper a écrit :
> > Currently, x86_64-softmmu qemu segfaults when trying to use > 4095M memsize.
> > This patch adds a simple check and error message (much like the 2047 limit
> > on
> > 32-bit hosts) on ram_size in the control path after we determine
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 03:07:20PM -0600, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> On 02/23/2010 02:30 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> >On 23.02.2010, at 18:02, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >
> >>Ryan Harper a écrit :
> >>>Currently, x86_64-softmmu qemu segfaults when trying to use> 4095M
> >>>memsize.
> >>>This patch ad
On 02/23/2010 02:30 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
On 23.02.2010, at 18:02, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Ryan Harper a écrit :
Currently, x86_64-softmmu qemu segfaults when trying to use> 4095M memsize.
This patch adds a simple check and error message (much like the 2047 limit on
32-bit hosts)
On 23.02.2010, at 18:02, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Ryan Harper a écrit :
>> Currently, x86_64-softmmu qemu segfaults when trying to use > 4095M memsize.
>> This patch adds a simple check and error message (much like the 2047 limit on
>> 32-bit hosts) on ram_size in the control path after we determi
Ryan Harper a écrit :
> Currently, x86_64-softmmu qemu segfaults when trying to use > 4095M memsize.
> This patch adds a simple check and error message (much like the 2047 limit on
> 32-bit hosts) on ram_size in the control path after we determine we're
> not using kvm
>
> Upstream qemu-kvm is aff
Currently, x86_64-softmmu qemu segfaults when trying to use > 4095M memsize.
This patch adds a simple check and error message (much like the 2047 limit on
32-bit hosts) on ram_size in the control path after we determine we're
not using kvm
Upstream qemu-kvm is affected if using the -no-kvm option;
10 matches
Mail list logo