On 5/20/19 8:05 AM, David Gibson wrote:
> When we added support for NVLink2 passthrough devices, we changed the
> phb_placement hook to handle the placement of NVLink2 bridges' specific
> resources. For compatibility we use a version that doesn't do this
> allocation for old machine types.
>
> H
On Mon, 20 May 2019 08:21:32 +0200
Laurent Vivier wrote:
> On 20/05/2019 08:05, David Gibson wrote:
> > When we added support for NVLink2 passthrough devices, we changed the
> > phb_placement hook to handle the placement of NVLink2 bridges' specific
> > resources. For compatibility we use a vers
On 20/05/2019 08:05, David Gibson wrote:
> When we added support for NVLink2 passthrough devices, we changed the
> phb_placement hook to handle the placement of NVLink2 bridges' specific
> resources. For compatibility we use a version that doesn't do this
> allocation for old machine types.
>
>
When we added support for NVLink2 passthrough devices, we changed the
phb_placement hook to handle the placement of NVLink2 bridges' specific
resources. For compatibility we use a version that doesn't do this
allocation for old machine types.
However, because of the delay between when the patch
