Hi Lucien,
When you do a re-roll of your patch, you should:
- Send it as a new thread (don't reply to an existing one)
- Add the re-roll count ([PATCH vX] in the subject, easily done using
the -v option of git format-patch).
On 3/4/19 8:39 AM, Lucien Murray-Pitts wrote:
> This fixes a regress
This fixes a regression in rsp packet vCont, this was due to the
recently added multiprocess support. (Short commit hash: e40e520).
The result is that vCont now does not recognise the case where
no process/thread is provided after the action.
This may not show up with GDB, but using Lauterbach Tr
Hi,
On 2/1/19 3:25 PM, Lucien Anti-Spam wrote:
> Hi Luc,
>
> Great feedback from both you and Eric - im blown away, I dont think
> theres a single 1byte ascii character left unturned there :)
> My coding style snuck in erywhere, as did my Scottish English!
>
> On Friday, February 1, 2019, 10:33:
Hi Luc,
Great feedback from both you and Eric - im blown away, I dont thinktheres a
single 1byte ascii character left unturned there :)My coding style snuck in
erywhere, as did my Scottish English!
On Friday, February 1, 2019, 10:33:18 PM GMT+9, Luc Michel
wrote: > > + GDBThreadIdKind v
Hi Lucien,
On 1/31/19 5:48 AM, Lucien Murray-Pitts wrote:
> The result is that vCont now does not recognise the case where no
> process/thread is provided after the action.
>
> This may not show up with GDB, but using Lauterbach Trace32, and Hexrays IDA
> Pro this issue is immediately seen.
> T
On 1/30/19 10:48 PM, Lucien Murray-Pitts wrote:
> The result is that vCont now does not recognise the case where no
> process/thread is provided after the action.
Thanks for re-sending; this one came through a lot nicer! Welcome to
the community; while a first submission can always be a bit daun
The result is that vCont now does not recognise the case where no
process/thread is provided after the action.
This may not show up with GDB, but using Lauterbach Trace32, and Hexrays IDA
Pro this issue is immediately seen.
The response is a "$#00" empty packet, showing it is unsupported packet.
On Thursday, January 31, 2019, 12:47:23 PM GMT+9, Eric Blake
wrote:
On 1/30/19 6:41 PM, Lucien Anti-Spam via Qemu-devel wrote:
> > This fixes a regression in rsp packet vCont due to recently added
> > multiprocess support. (Short commit hash: e40e520).
> >
> Your mailer completely b
On 1/30/19 6:41 PM, Lucien Anti-Spam via Qemu-devel wrote:
> This fixes a regression in rsp packet vCont due to recently added
> multiprocess support. (Short commit hash: e40e520).
>
Your mailer completely botched the message (wrong line endings?) Can
you please resend, preferably using git sen
This fixes a regression in rsp packet vCont due to recently added multiprocess
support. (Short commit hash: e40e520).
The result is that vCont now does not recognise the case where no
process/thread is provided after the action.
This may not show up with GDB, but using Lauterbach Trace32, and He
10 matches
Mail list logo
